top of page
CineWire_WebLogo02_WHT.png
CineWire_WebLogo_WHT.png

The Slow Cinema Movement: A Return to Contemplation in Film



In the fast-paced, content-saturated world of modern cinema, a quiet revolution has emerged over the past few decades. Known as the Slow Cinema Movement, this style of filmmaking rejects the rapid cuts, action-packed sequences, and quick storytelling of mainstream cinema in favor of long takes, minimal dialogue, and meditative pacing. Directors like Béla Tarr, Abbas Kiarostami, Tsai Ming-liang, and Chantal Akerman have pioneered this movement, offering audiences a contemplative and immersive experience that emphasizes stillness, silence, and the passage of time.


Defining Slow Cinema

At its core, slow cinema is about challenging the viewer’s expectations of what a film should be. It places a premium on atmosphere and mood over plot, focusing on the minute details of everyday life or existential themes. The films are often characterized by:


  • Long takes that allow the viewer to observe and reflect.

  • Minimal dialogue, with a preference for silence or ambient sounds.

  • Sparse plot development, often allowing the viewer to interpret or experience the film rather than simply follow a linear story.

  • Static or slow-moving camera work that mirrors the natural rhythm of life.

  • Extended shots of landscapes, people, or mundane activities.


This approach is designed to invite reflection, allowing viewers to immerse themselves in the moment rather than be swept along by a narrative.


Origins and Early Influences

The roots of slow cinema can be traced back to the works of European and Asian filmmakers in the mid-20th century. Directors like Yasujiro Ozu and Robert Bresson are often credited as early influences, with their films focusing on minimalism, humanism, and the passage of time. Ozu’s static camera and focus on the everyday lives of Japanese families, and Bresson’s sparse, stripped-down narratives, set the stage for what would later evolve into the slow cinema movement.


In the 1970s, directors like Andrei Tarkovsky in Russia and Chantal Akerman in Belgium began to push the boundaries further, creating films that featured long takes, minimal action, and deep philosophical themes. Tarkovsky’s works like Stalker (1979) and The Mirror (1975) were deeply contemplative, using time and space as central elements in storytelling. Akerman’s Jeanne Dielman, 23 quai du Commerce, 1080 Bruxelles (1975) is one of the most iconic early examples of slow cinema, with its meticulous focus on the daily routines of a housewife.


Key Filmmakers of the Movement

Several filmmakers have come to define the modern slow cinema movement:


  • Béla Tarr: A Hungarian filmmaker known for his bleak and meditative films, Tarr’s work, including Sátántangó(1994) and The Turin Horse (2011), is often seen as the epitome of slow cinema. His films are famous for their long takes, some lasting up to 10 minutes, and for exploring existential and societal decay.

  • Abbas Kiarostami: The Iranian filmmaker’s films, like Taste of Cherry (1997) and The Wind Will Carry Us(1999), often feature characters in moments of waiting or contemplation, with sparse dialogue and minimalist settings. Kiarostami’s films challenge traditional narratives, offering viewers a deeply philosophical exploration of life, death, and human existence.

  • Tsai Ming-liang: A Taiwanese director known for films like Goodbye, Dragon Inn (2003) and Stray Dogs(2013), Tsai’s work focuses on urban isolation and the passage of time. His films often feature little to no dialogue, and his characters engage in repetitive, mundane tasks that reflect their inner emotional states.

  • Apichatpong Weerasethakul: The Thai filmmaker's works, such as Uncle Boonmee Who Can Recall His Past Lives (2010), blend the mystical with the ordinary. His films often feature slow, meditative scenes that draw the audience into the spiritual and metaphysical aspects of life.


Themes and Motifs

Slow cinema is often deeply philosophical, exploring themes like the human condition, memory, and the passage of time. Many slow cinema films are concerned with existentialism, asking questions about the meaning of life, death, and human experience. The use of long takes and stillness is designed to force the viewer to confront these questions in a more immersive and reflective manner.


Nature often plays a significant role in slow cinema, with extended shots of landscapes, skies, or bodies of water being used as metaphors for the characters’ internal journeys. These images create a sense of timelessness, suggesting that life continues in cycles, independent of human drama.


The Viewing Experience

Watching a slow cinema film is a different experience compared to mainstream movies. Rather than being a passive recipient of a fast-moving narrative, the viewer is asked to actively engage with the film. The slow pacing requires patience and attention to detail, as the meaning often lies in what is not explicitly said or shown.


The extended takes and moments of silence allow for a meditative experience, where the viewer has time to reflect on the visuals and emotions presented on screen. This stands in stark contrast to the frenetic editing and sensory overload that dominate much of contemporary commercial cinema.


Criticism and Rebuttal

Slow cinema is not without its critics. Some argue that its deliberate pacing can be tedious or pretentious, catering only to a niche audience. Detractors claim that these films lack accessibility and can be seen as indulgent, with little regard for audience engagement.

However, defenders of the movement argue that the very slowness that frustrates some viewers is what gives these films their power. By slowing down time, these films encourage a deeper connection with the material, allowing for a more profound and personal cinematic experience.


Legacy and Influence

The slow cinema movement has had a profound impact on both independent and art-house filmmakers. Its influence can be seen in the works of directors like Kelly Reichardt (Certain Women, First Cow) and Barry Jenkins (Moonlight), who incorporate elements of slow cinema into their work without fully embracing the aesthetic.


Despite being a niche genre, slow cinema has found a dedicated audience and has helped to keep alive the idea of film as an artistic medium capable of deep emotional and intellectual engagement.


Conclusion

Slow cinema offers a counterpoint to the fast-paced, content-driven world of modern filmmaking. Through its contemplative pacing, minimal dialogue, and emphasis on atmosphere over plot, it invites viewers to slow down, reflect, and engage with the material in a way that few other genres do. In an industry often driven by spectacle, slow cinema is a reminder of the power of film as a medium for meditation, emotion, and thought.






Komentáře


bottom of page